Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

anonhuff · Feb 5, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Correct me if I'm wrong in this line of thinking, but wouldn't Aaron Saxton now be allowed a redress/response on the record since he has definately been adversely affected since his name was spoken during parliamentary priviledge?

Vicki Dunstan's face looks like a sack of day old oatmeal.

Anon123456 · Feb 5, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

TinyDancer;1149230 said:

The comment refers to the history of the 58 times that the Senate has allowed a person named in its proceedings to table a reply. In all those times, it is very rare for the Senate not to simply table the reply unchanged. The point their making is that there must have been something striking about the February part of the CoS's reply to Xenophon for the Senate Committee to decide not to table it.

maybe they gave them the anon pamphlet and it made them all bwhahhahah to the point they said it shouldnt even be referenced.

TinyDancer · Feb 5, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

El Diablo;1149129 said:

I read the challenge to the CoS, as having a layer of rhetoric - aimed at fellow senators. Like "hang on a sec, why ARE they fighting so hard against an inquiry?"

Even if they don't know what to make of what Xenophon's presented, the CoS's objections to an inquiry coupled with what I'm guessing was some ill-advised (and rejected) submission material, might make the reluctant senators think again about an inquiry.

You win.

Clamosaurus · Feb 5, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Sponge;1149219 said:

From what we have learned from the cult's behaviour, what do we think their responses to Senator Xenophon will be?

I'll go first.
I think they twist it to come across as being persecuted and will say, "It is not up to us to prove ourselves innocent"

Anonymous;1148966 said:

It would be productive if Xenuphon and media were educated on what happened with what was compiled and submitted to/by Jeff Stone/Cof$ in Riverside with relation to Anonymous.
Since Dunstan is trying to use Anonymous against the call for an inquiry

.

Anonymous · Feb 5, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

TinyDancer;1149230 said:

The comment refers to the history of the 58 times that the Senate has allowed a person named in its proceedings to table a reply. In all those times, it is very rare for the Senate not to simply table the reply unchanged. The point their making is that there must have been something striking about the February part of the CoS's reply to Xenophon for the Senate Committee to decide not to table it.

My guess is the cult tried to submit a document including personal information intended to defame the ex-scientologists who wrote letters to Xenophon. If this is what they sent, it is likely that the Senate Privileges Committee was put off by such an obviously vindictive and childish response.

Optimisticate · Feb 5, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Anonymous;1149271 said:

My guess is the cult tried to submit a document including personal information intended to defame the ex-scientologists who wrote letters to Xenophon. If this is what they sent, it is likely that the Senate Privileges Committee was put off by such an obviously vindictive and childish response.

IF (repeat) IF that is what they did, it should raise eyebrows all over the world and raise questions about this so-called personal information. Particularly in a recent case in Australia.

Strong Strength · Feb 5, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Lorelei;1149193 said:

If Scientology has nothing to hide, and if Xenophon's statements were in any way false, then Scientology should not have any problem being questioned publicly and providing verifiable proof and relevant records to back up their claims.

Thing is, I don't recall President Obama making any sort of formal response to the citizenship conspiracies. And I don't think his no-response caused a widespread outrage to the majority of the American people.

I'm not trying to suggest that the CoS is innocent. I'm just guessing that they'll take the same tactic and not even really bother with the allegations, ostensibly to keep from wasting time on stuff they think is bullshit.

It might not make them look guilty for using ignore tech. And I'm not sure if it necessarily should, either.

Anonymous · Feb 5, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Chances are, they'll make a lulzy footbulleting response disproportionate to Xenophon's challenge, like they usually do. Which might be what he's hoping for, come to think about it.

Paul Schofield · Feb 6, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Co$ got to say some crap about those of us who gave Xenophon enough ammo to hit them from parliamentary privilege.

They can now repeat that ad nauseum as it too is now protected by parliamentary privilege.

THAT is their win.

Right up until the Senate DO investigate the cult and we get our docs and stories put forward and collaborated and then cult will be seen to be lying all the way.

Trolls on this thread are just trying to distract/bury this thread in bs - plus OSA get more "statistics" when pro-scilon stuff is posted/printed/viewed.

Means more chance of something other than beans and rice for the "most ethical group on the planet."

Nic X's challenge will hit a chord with Ozzie people - if Co$ has nothing to hide, why not welcome an invest? Since Co$ doesn't want invest = Co$ has something to hide = invest is needed into scamUFOcrazycult.

As Bryan Seymour pointed out on his last report on Co$ a few days ago, a LOT more Oz media hits are coming at Co$ and that'll mean a lot more pressure for an inquiry.

Attempted debates about masks are pathetic - just shows level of desperation now sunk to by Co$.

TinyDancer · Feb 6, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Thread split: http://forums.whyweprotest.net/318-...upport-sen-xens-call-cos-agree-inquiry-61015/

Anonymous · Feb 6, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Nick Xenophon - Encyclopedia Dramatica

grebe · Feb 6, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Tax exempt charitable organizations are expected to do more good than harm to their communities. If a community suspects that a charity is behaving in a harmful way, the citizens of that community have every right to call the charity to account.

There must be due process, of course. But the charity cannot tell the community to go fuck itself.

Anonynamefag · Feb 6, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

grebe;1150067 said:

There must be due process, of course. But the charity cannot tell the community to go fuck itself.

The fact that they're listed as a charity is downright disgusting. I can understand them being listed as a religion, but a charity? Exactly what do they donate to that makes them a charity, besides their own front groups?

grebe · Feb 6, 2010

Re: Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

Anonynamefag;1150124 said:

The fact that they're listed as a charity is downright disgusting. I can understand them being listed as a religion, but a charity? Exactly what do they donate to that makes them a charity, besides their own front groups?

Oh my fault. For tax purposes, charities and religions are similar and the argument for not taxing is similar, as I understand. Charities and religions traditionally serve as a kind of social safety net.

Log in or Sign up

Xenophon challenges CoS to agree to senate inquiry

anonhuff Member

Anon123456 Member

TinyDancer Member

Clamosaurus Member

Anonymous Member

Optimisticate Member

Strong Strength Member

Anonymous Member

Paul Schofield Member

TinyDancer Member

Anonymous Member

grebe Member

Anonynamefag Member

grebe Member

Share This Page

Customize Theme Colors

Predefined Skins